Study of Congenital Ocular Anomalies Prevalent in Routine Eye OPD in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Main Article Content

Arvind Kumar
Abha Shukla
Dinesh Matoli


Aims: Congenital ocular anomalies require treatment, visual rehabilitation and genetic counselling. Goes undetected in neonates and children due to lack of routine eye checkup. Diagnosed later during eye examination or when come for disability certificate.

Study Design: Prospective and observational study.

Place and Duration of Study: We conducted study at tertiary care hospital, over a period of six months (from January 2018 to June 2018).

Methodology: Patients with congenital ocular anomalies irrespective of their age were identified. Findings were confirmed by detailed ocular examination and investigations when required. Whatever best management like correcting refractive error, surgery, low vision aids or rehabilitation was advised. Those having acquired defects giving similar appearance as in congenital anomalies, cases of ocular trauma, infections, with prior surgical intervention were excluded.

Results: Over a period of six months 128 eyes were detected with congenital ocular anomalies. The most common anomalies were microphthalmos, microcornea and iris coloboma seen in 85 eyes. Other congenital anomalies were congenital cataract, nystagmus, anophthalmos, aniridia, congenital glaucoma, Ankyloblepharon, coloboma of disc, congenital esotropia, lid coloboma, congenital ptosis, axenfield anomaly, limbal dermoid.

Conclusion: Patient with congenital ocular anomalies and their parents should be counseled regarding possible current treatment, visual prognosis and genetic counselling regardless of age and time of presentation.

Congenital ocular anomalies, microphthalmo, microcornea, iris coloboma.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kumar, A., Shukla, A., & Matoli, D. (2019). Study of Congenital Ocular Anomalies Prevalent in Routine Eye OPD in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Ophthalmology Research: An International Journal, 11(2), 1-7.
Original Research Article


Bourne RRA, Flaxman SR, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli MV, Das A, Jonas JB, et al. Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(9): e888-e897.
DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30293-0
Epub 2017 Aug 2

Mariotti SP. Global data on visual impairments 2010. Geneva, Switzerland; 2012.

Shamanna B, Muralikrishnan R. Childhood cataract: Magnitude, management, economics and impact. Community Eye Health Journal. 2004;17.

Gilbert C, Foster A. Childhood blindness in the context of VISION 2020—The right to sight. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2001;79.

Gogate P, Kalua K, Courtright P. Blindness in childhood in developing countries: Time for a reassessment? PLoS Med. 2009;6(12):12–5.

World Health Organization (WHO). Global initiative for the elimination of avoidable blindness. Who Global Report. Geneva, Switzerland; 2000.

Bodunde OT, Ajibode HA. Congenital eye diseases at Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital, Sagamu, Nigeria. Niger J Med. 2006;15(3):291-4.

World Health Organization. Blindness and visual impairment [Internet]. WHO Web Report.

World Health Organization (WHO). Strategic Plan for VISION 2020: The right to sight. New Delhi; 2000.

Lowry RB, Sibbald B. The alberta congenital anomalies surveillance system. Fifth Report, 1980-1998. 2001;2-4.

Professor Helen Dolk, Pat Doyle, Ester Garne. A review of environmental risk factors for congenital anomalies Edition. 1 (Uploaded to Website). 2004;7-30.

Parag NT, Sagar VC. A study on prevalence of congenital ocular anomalies in paediatric age group. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2015;4(4):884- 888.

Behera S, Chowdhury RK, Sar M. A clinico-embryological study of congenital ocular and its adnexal anomalies in a tertiary care hospital. Int J Anat Res. 2019;7(1.2):6138-43.