A Comparison of Accommodation Amplitudes of Three Different Acrylic Intraocular Lenses

Ramazan Yağcı *

Pamukkale University, Medical School, Department of Ophthalmology, Denizli, Turkey

Mesut Erdurmuş

Hacettepe University, Medical School, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey

Uğur Emrah Altıparmak

Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey

Bahri Aydın

Gazi University, Medical School, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey

Ibrahim Feyzi Hepşen

Gazi University, Medical School, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey

Sunay Duman

Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Aim: To assess the accommodative amplitudes of three different foldable acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) by measuring with photorefractor Plusoptix CR03 (Plusoptix GmbH, Nuernberg, Germany).

Methods: Fifty five pseudophakic eyes of 46 patients (mean age 65.25±10.63 years) were analyzed one month after uneventful phacoemulsification and IOL implantation surgery. Rayner Centerflex (C-Flex) (n=17), AcyrSof MA60BM (n=17), Sensar AR40e (n=21) IOLs were implanted. An objective, dynamic measurement technique with R mode of Plusoptix CR03 device was used to measure accommodation. Accommodation was measured at near distance (0.33m) and far distance (5m).

Results: Accommodation amplitudes (mean ± SD) measured with photorefractor at near distance in Rayner, AcyrSof and Sensar groups were 1.45±0.76 diopter (D), 2.82±1.88 D, 2.44±1.02 D, respectively. Accommodative response of AcyrSof and Sensar IOLs was greater than Rayner IOL significantly (p=0.027 and p=0.004, respectively). At far distance, measured accommodation amplitudes in Rayner, AcyrSof and Sensar groups were 1.34±0.54 D, 1.87±0.74 D and 1.74±1.70 D, respectively. There were no significant difference between the groups (p=0.109).

Conclusion: The 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOLs, AcrySof MA60BM and Sensar AR40e) had a significantly higher accommodative response than the 1-piece plate-haptic hydrophilic acrylic Rayner C-Flex IOL.

 

Keywords: Accommodation, intraocular lens, photorefractor, pseudophakic accommodation


How to Cite

Yağcı, Ramazan, Mesut Erdurmuş, Uğur Emrah Altıparmak, Bahri Aydın, Ibrahim Feyzi Hepşen, and Sunay Duman. 2014. “A Comparison of Accommodation Amplitudes of Three Different Acrylic Intraocular Lenses”. Ophthalmology Research: An International Journal 2 (6):418-23. https://doi.org/10.9734/OR/2014/12038.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.