Presbyopia and Vision-related Quality of Life in Calabar South, Nigeria
Ophthalmology Research: An International Journal,
Aim: To determine the magnitude of presbyopia and the effect of uncorrected presbyopia on vision-related quality of life in Calabar South, Nigeria.
Study Design: A community-based, descriptive cross-sectional study.
Place and Duration of Study: Calabar South Local Government Area, Nigeria, between November 2016 and February 2017.
Methods: We included 422 adults (198 men, 224 women) aged 35 years and above, selected by cluster random sampling. Subjective distance refraction was done on all participants with distant visual acuity less than 6/6. Near visual acuity was assessed at 40 centimetres with a Times Roman near vision (British N system) chart, with distant correction in place if required. Presbyopia was defined as inability to read N8 at 40 centimetres unaided or with habitually worn distance refractive correction, with improvement of near vision by at least one line on a Times Roman near vision chart with use of a plus lens. An adapted and validated quality of life questionnaires were administered to the participants.
Results: A total of 422 participants were examined and interviewed. The prevalence of presbyopia was 55.5%. There was no significant association between gender and prevalence of presbyopia. The presbyopia correction coverage in the study population was 38.0% with a strong positive correlation between age and the required near vision spectacle lens power (r = 0.88, p < .001). Another key finding was a significant association between uncorrected presbyopia and reduced quality of life.
Conclusion: This study has demonstrated that the burden of presbyopia in the study population is enormous in spite of the fact that it has a cost effective intervention. The key findings in this study underscore the need to scale up presbyopic correction services in the study area.
- quality of life
- Calabar South
How to Cite
American Academy of Ophthalmology. Basic and clinical science course, section 3. Clinical Optics. San Francisco (CA): American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2016-2017:265.
Nirmalan P, Sannapaneni K, Gultapalli NR, Ravi T. A population based assessment of presbyopia in the state of Andhra Pradesh, south India: The Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci. 2006;47:2324-2328.
IAPB. Vision atlas: The global burden of vision impairment. International Agency for Prevention of Blindness. 2017.
(Accessed 22 November 2017)
Holden BA, Fricke TR, Ho SM, Wong R, Schlenther G, Cronje S, et al. Global vision impairment due to uncorrected presbyopia. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:1731-1739.
Sherwin JC, Keeffe JE, Kuper H, Islam FM, Muller A, Mathenge W. Functional presbyopia in a rural Kenyan population: The unmet presbyopic need. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;36(3):245-251.
McDonnell PJ, Lee P, Spritzear K, Linblad AS, Hays RD. Associations of presbyopia with vision-targeted health-related quality of life. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:1577-1581.
Patel I, Munoz B, Burke AG, Kayongoya A, McHiwa W, Schwarzwalder AW, West SK. Impact of presbyopia on quality of life in a rural African Setting. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:728-734.
Burke GA, Patel I, Munoz B, Kayongoya A, Mchiwa W, Schwarzwalder AW, West SK. Population based study of presbyopia in rural Tanzania. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:723-727.
National Bureau of Statistics. Annual abstract of statistics 2010. Federal Republic of Nigeria, National Bureau of Statistics; 2010.
Naing L, Winn T, Rusli BN. Practical issues in calculating sample size for prevalence studies. Arch Orofac Sci. 2006;1:9-14.
Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research. Indian J Psychol Med. 2013;35(2):121-126.
Muhammad RC. Prevalence of presbyopia and the impact of uncorrected presbyopia on the quality of life in rural Gwagwalada, Abuja Nigeria [master's thesis]. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. 2008;72.
Uche JN, Ezegwui IR, Uche E, Onwasigwe EN, Umeh RE, Onwasigwe CN. Prevalence of presbyopia in a rural African community. Rural Remote Health. 2014;14(3).
Accessed 7 April 2016
Muhammad RC, Jamda MA, Langnap L. Prevalence of presbyopia in rural Abuja, Nigeria. Ann Niger Med. 2015;9(2):56-60.
Laviers HR, Omar F, Jecha H, Kassim G, Gilbert C. Presbyopia spectacle coverage, willingness to pay for near correction and the impact of correcting uncorrected presbyopia in adults in Zanzibar, East Africa. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci. 2010;51(2):1234-1241.
Goertz AD, Stewart WC, Burns WR, Stewart JA, Nelson LA. Review of the impact of presbyopia on quality of life in the developing and developed world. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92:497-500.
Lu Q, Congdon N, He X, Murthy GV, Yang A, He W. Quality of life and near vision impairment due to functional presbyopia among rural Chinese adults. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci. 2011;52(7):4118-4123.
Hickenbotham A, Roorda A, Steinmaus C, Glasser A. Meta-analysis of sex differences in presbyopia. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci. 2012;53(6):3215-3220.
Umar MM, Muhammad N, Alhassan MB. Prevalence of presbyopia and spectacle correction coverage in a rural population of North West Nigeria. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:1195-1201.
Malu KZ. Presbyopia in Plateau State, Nigeria: A hospital study. J Med Trop. 2013;15(2):151-155.
Muhammad RC, Jamda M. Presbyopic correction coverage and barriers to the use of near vision spectacles in rural Abuja, Nigeria. Sub-Saharan African J Med. 2016;3(1):20-24.
Muhammad N, Alhassan MB, Umar MM. Visual function and vision-related quality of life in presbyopic adult population of Northwestern Nigeria. Niger Med J. 2015;56(5):317-322.
Bekibele CO, Gureje O. Impact of self-reported visual impairment on quality of life in the Ibadan study of aging. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(5):612-615.
Abstract View: 2298 times
PDF Download: 1096 times