Ametropiain Children: A Review of 432 Cases
Makita Chantal *
Department of Ophthalmology, University and Hospital Center of Brazzaville, Congo
Nganga Ngabou Géraud Charles Freddy
Department of Ophthalmology, University and Hospital Center of Brazzaville, Congo
Koulimaya Reinette Christelle
Department of Ophthalmology, University and Hospital Center of Brazzaville, Congo
Diatewa Bénédicte
Department of Ophthalmology, University and Hospital Center of Brazzaville, Congo
Massamba Alphonse
Department of Biostatistics and Biosciences, Brazzaville Institute of Health and Sports, Brazzaville, Congo
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Aims: To determine the epidemiological and clinical aspects of ametropia and their impact on low vision.
Study Design: Retrospective.
Place and Duration of Study: Department of Ophthalmology, University and Hospital Center of Brazzaville Congo between January 2014 and December 2016.
Methodology: The records of 1,126 children aged 5–15 years who attended the ophthalmic department were assessed. A refractive error was considered visual acuity less than 0.7 (decimal
notation of visual acuity) on the measurement of visual acuity by far in monocular to 5 meters using otoptypes adapted for age.
Results: Of the 1,126 records, 432 children had a refractive disorder, with a relative frequency of 38.3%. Of these, 242 (56%) were males, and 190 (44%) were females. Concerning the reasons for consultation, a headache ranked first 218 (50.5%), followed by problems with visual acuity 106 (24.5%). Astigmatism was the most common type of ametropia 348 (80.6%), followed by myopia 52 (12%) and farsightedness 32 (7.4%). Astigmatism was present in 52.4% of boys and 28.2% of girls (P<0.05). Astigmatism was associated with myopia in 15.7% of cases and hyperopia in 7% of cases. The mean age of the patients was 10.4 years, with children aged 8–10 years accounting for the majority of cases (n = 231, 53.4%). Visual acuity was ≤0.7 in 432 patients with refractive errors. Ametropia did not improve in 9 (2%) cases. There were 2 cases (0.5%) of anisometropia. In the majority of 296 (68.5%) cases, ametropia was not severe. In 225 (52.9%) ametropic cases, the astigmatism was the simple form.
Conclusion: The prevalence of ametropia observed in this study points to the need for action to enable early detection and treatment.
Keywords: Child, visual acuity, ametropia, astigmatism